Ehhh... the whole idea of social housing is that it is not part of the market. The houses should belong to housing associations (woningbouverengingen) which the tenants control partly. So yes, the state will still be a problem, but they should not be sold and traded on the market. Social housing (volkshuisvesting) was ruined by the neoliberals in the nineties. The question is more if it is enough as a strategy to want to go back to the days of the welfare state, but those days were for sure better for poor people than the mess now.
And also: what answer would you propose, if it is not social housing?
Ehhh... the whole idea of
Ehhh... the whole idea of social housing is that it is not part of the market. The houses should belong to housing associations (woningbouverengingen) which the tenants control partly. So yes, the state will still be a problem, but they should not be sold and traded on the market. Social housing (volkshuisvesting) was ruined by the neoliberals in the nineties. The question is more if it is enough as a strategy to want to go back to the days of the welfare state, but those days were for sure better for poor people than the mess now.
And also: what answer would you propose, if it is not social housing?