Imo the article linked is a bunch of bullshit and mostly relies on guilt by association arguments ( something that cancel culture relies heavily on as well, e.g. she once quoted the research by a person who did a thing that the author thinks is bad so therefore Clementine is bad. ). And even if you don't like the person who said or wrote something, you can still engage with the argument Instead of attacking the person. Or engage with the ideas in a critical way without dismissing it because someone on the internet accuses hem of "priming survivors". read some of their zines or articles you might enjoy it. Or not. But at least then you'll know what their arguments are and can form your own opinion.
Imo the article linked is a
Imo the article linked is a bunch of bullshit and mostly relies on guilt by association arguments ( something that cancel culture relies heavily on as well, e.g. she once quoted the research by a person who did a thing that the author thinks is bad so therefore Clementine is bad. ). And even if you don't like the person who said or wrote something, you can still engage with the argument Instead of attacking the person. Or engage with the ideas in a critical way without dismissing it because someone on the internet accuses hem of "priming survivors". read some of their zines or articles you might enjoy it. Or not. But at least then you'll know what their arguments are and can form your own opinion.