You simply cannot say "anarchist perspectibe" and then argue for hierarchy and authoritarianism. This is the most obvious contradiction i have ever seen. You cannot be against hierarchy (for anarchy) and be in favor of hierarchy.
This is apart from whatever else you argue, which has some understandable points, although in the end it is flawed. (For instance, why is the virus the biggest threat to freedom? You do not explain this, and it does not make sense. Humanity has been and will be confronted with new diseases. If that ends freedom, well, then freedom is an impossibility. Obviously, of course, you can still live free in the presence of disease, because we have always lived in the presence of disease. Also, if the last pandemic shows anything - the spanish flu - , the virus will eventually pass.) But at least stop caliing yourself an anarchst.
You simply cannot say
You simply cannot say "anarchist perspectibe" and then argue for hierarchy and authoritarianism. This is the most obvious contradiction i have ever seen. You cannot be against hierarchy (for anarchy) and be in favor of hierarchy.
This is apart from whatever else you argue, which has some understandable points, although in the end it is flawed. (For instance, why is the virus the biggest threat to freedom? You do not explain this, and it does not make sense. Humanity has been and will be confronted with new diseases. If that ends freedom, well, then freedom is an impossibility. Obviously, of course, you can still live free in the presence of disease, because we have always lived in the presence of disease. Also, if the last pandemic shows anything - the spanish flu - , the virus will eventually pass.) But at least stop caliing yourself an anarchst.