That is the most cynical thing coming from an 'anarchist?!'. So on the one hand dogmatic sectarianism and on the other you are prepared to make selective exceptions when they fit you? Your whole argument is flimsy thing.
Revolutions are a heap of contradictions and one can criticize safely from afar but your critique will not change anything. Only direct engagement. Next to that also the anarchist movement has had its leaders, this is something most never really got to give a good answer on. I think leadership is not necessarily a problematic thing and anarchists historically have also not always been against it either. The question has always been how accountable they are, for how long, for which function etc.
This sloganism is bringing us nowhere and has no political perspective whatsoever.
Cynical remarks...
That is the most cynical thing coming from an 'anarchist?!'. So on the one hand dogmatic sectarianism and on the other you are prepared to make selective exceptions when they fit you? Your whole argument is flimsy thing.
Revolutions are a heap of contradictions and one can criticize safely from afar but your critique will not change anything. Only direct engagement. Next to that also the anarchist movement has had its leaders, this is something most never really got to give a good answer on. I think leadership is not necessarily a problematic thing and anarchists historically have also not always been against it either. The question has always been how accountable they are, for how long, for which function etc.
This sloganism is bringing us nowhere and has no political perspective whatsoever.
Another comrade.