You don't understand it because you obvioulsy are too short minded. I'm assuming your information comes from Al Jaazera? Have you ever tried to establish an anarchist or communist system within a capitalist world hegemony? No, because this is not possible everyone in this world is some way or the other reliant on this system. Thats why If you anarcho kiddie squat a house you won't survive without buying goods aka. taking part in the system. Thats why it is considered to be a revolution and not a libertarian socialist utopia, which again is not possible in the current state of the global hegemony.
Oil: Yes Rojava is reliant on the extraction of oil and oil trade. The main addressee of the extracted oil is the local population. However, it is not the main customer. The deal is with Assad, also with the Iraqi state and the Barzani government in Iraqi Kurdistan. These are of course all social systems that run counter to the ideals of the PYD and the entire TEV-DEM. Sometimes you are in an open conflict with one another. The self-government is aware of the ecological and political problems, but cannot currently do without the oil trade. Because, guess what natural resource to live the self sustainable utopia is difficult if you are bombed from all sides.
Abdullah Öcalan: Yes the personification is sometimes problematic, however, a revolution without a theoretical framework is de facto chaos. He laid the groundwork combining Wallerstein, Marx, Freud, Goldstein, Bookchin and all the good theory that helps to make a revolution in todays world possible. I do not see a lot of similarities with Mao tbh, since there is until today no central commitee. There are great documentaries explaining the grass root democratic functioning of the autonmous commites it appears that you are not too much into reading yourself. A mediating force (political police if you want to call it) is unfortuntely also needed, since patriachy, religous fundamentalism and other problematic ideologies are not overcome from one day to another.
C'mon show a bit of realism and try to adress the issues that are legitimite criticism rational, a morally perfect self government is in the middle east sadly not achieved yet, neither is it possible.
Yes most of the radical left identifies with this revolution, and I doubt that you've understood the revolution or the political context around it.
You don't understand it because you obvioulsy are too short mind
You don't understand it because you obvioulsy are too short minded. I'm assuming your information comes from Al Jaazera? Have you ever tried to establish an anarchist or communist system within a capitalist world hegemony? No, because this is not possible everyone in this world is some way or the other reliant on this system. Thats why If you anarcho kiddie squat a house you won't survive without buying goods aka. taking part in the system. Thats why it is considered to be a revolution and not a libertarian socialist utopia, which again is not possible in the current state of the global hegemony.
Oil: Yes Rojava is reliant on the extraction of oil and oil trade. The main addressee of the extracted oil is the local population. However, it is not the main customer. The deal is with Assad, also with the Iraqi state and the Barzani government in Iraqi Kurdistan. These are of course all social systems that run counter to the ideals of the PYD and the entire TEV-DEM. Sometimes you are in an open conflict with one another. The self-government is aware of the ecological and political problems, but cannot currently do without the oil trade. Because, guess what natural resource to live the self sustainable utopia is difficult if you are bombed from all sides.
Abdullah Öcalan: Yes the personification is sometimes problematic, however, a revolution without a theoretical framework is de facto chaos. He laid the groundwork combining Wallerstein, Marx, Freud, Goldstein, Bookchin and all the good theory that helps to make a revolution in todays world possible. I do not see a lot of similarities with Mao tbh, since there is until today no central commitee. There are great documentaries explaining the grass root democratic functioning of the autonmous commites it appears that you are not too much into reading yourself. A mediating force (political police if you want to call it) is unfortuntely also needed, since patriachy, religous fundamentalism and other problematic ideologies are not overcome from one day to another.
C'mon show a bit of realism and try to adress the issues that are legitimite criticism rational, a morally perfect self government is in the middle east sadly not achieved yet, neither is it possible.
Yes most of the radical left identifies with this revolution, and I doubt that you've understood the revolution or the political context around it.