immigrants are not a race, therefore one can said to be discriminating on descent rather than calling it/her/him a racist.
furthermore, the things said above are a bit contradixionairy; A specific precair situation is given to immigrants, how can they have the same common struggle as ´locals´, who are not in this precair situation?
and more: the whole story sounds like the anarchist organization (sic!) for reconstruction of militant proletariat , tends to set ¨rules¨ about how to be an anarchist. How? No ruler. How can you come up with imho ridiculous stating that one has to materialise before having right to have an opinion?
for example, someone new to the squatting scene, who has never squattted a house yet, is not being alowed to bring in some fresh point of views about possible squatting tactics, because this person has not yet squatted something?
And last but not least, just as ¨locals¨, immigrants are, above anything humans. Borders nor states nor any ¨anarchistic´ organisation should imo see them any different than just any other human. To me, statements such like ¨precair situation of immigrants¨ ,¨the power off immigrants¨ are actualy patriarchal, stigmatic, discriminiating and dont value the core principall off equality!Seeing them as tools for your upcoming revolution puts them in an position they havent necessarily asked for to be put in. people are people, no matter what their descent is. ,Thinking descent has an added value for your revolution-porn-thinking is actually victimising them in your behalf.
Also to me is unclear still, if it matters at all, what in your opnion an immigrant is? An immigrant who has acquired dutch papers is then a dutch worker?
Maybe the word you are looking for is asylum-seekers? people who didnt had the luck to be born in an spoiled rich country and therefore have to suffer from great indifference from state and civilizians, when trying , for whatever to reason, start a life in an spoiled rich country without having the ¨right¨ papers to do so freely, with the exact same general possibilities and rights, as them who are born there.
Real injustice.
Also i am wondering, is the author an immigrant?Otherwise the materilastic basis is lacking :)
Nevertheless, i wish the anarchistic platform to facilitate the self-reconstruction off the militant proletariat, all the best
and hope soon to see more rocks than words flying around :)
Greetings a non conformed, political motivated, squatter from somewhere.
thoughts, not trolls, (no censoring s.v.p. indy)
immigrants are not a race, therefore one can said to be discriminating on descent rather than calling it/her/him a racist.
furthermore, the things said above are a bit contradixionairy; A specific precair situation is given to immigrants, how can they have the same common struggle as ´locals´, who are not in this precair situation?
and more: the whole story sounds like the anarchist organization (sic!) for reconstruction of militant proletariat , tends to set ¨rules¨ about how to be an anarchist. How? No ruler. How can you come up with imho ridiculous stating that one has to materialise before having right to have an opinion?
for example, someone new to the squatting scene, who has never squattted a house yet, is not being alowed to bring in some fresh point of views about possible squatting tactics, because this person has not yet squatted something?
And last but not least, just as ¨locals¨, immigrants are, above anything humans. Borders nor states nor any ¨anarchistic´ organisation should imo see them any different than just any other human. To me, statements such like ¨precair situation of immigrants¨ ,¨the power off immigrants¨ are actualy patriarchal, stigmatic, discriminiating and dont value the core principall off equality!Seeing them as tools for your upcoming revolution puts them in an position they havent necessarily asked for to be put in. people are people, no matter what their descent is. ,Thinking descent has an added value for your revolution-porn-thinking is actually victimising them in your behalf.
Also to me is unclear still, if it matters at all, what in your opnion an immigrant is? An immigrant who has acquired dutch papers is then a dutch worker?
Maybe the word you are looking for is asylum-seekers? people who didnt had the luck to be born in an spoiled rich country and therefore have to suffer from great indifference from state and civilizians, when trying , for whatever to reason, start a life in an spoiled rich country without having the ¨right¨ papers to do so freely, with the exact same general possibilities and rights, as them who are born there.
Real injustice.
Also i am wondering, is the author an immigrant?Otherwise the materilastic basis is lacking :)
Nevertheless, i wish the anarchistic platform to facilitate the self-reconstruction off the militant proletariat, all the best
and hope soon to see more rocks than words flying around :)
Greetings a non conformed, political motivated, squatter from somewhere.