Update on the case of A. Parsa - 5 January 2021, the new deadline of IND on the case of extradition to greece
Hier kun je discussieren over Update on the case of A. Parsa - 5 January 2021, the new deadline of IND on the case of extradition to greece.
Update information:
The previous deadline for submitting an appeal was December 8, 2020, but due to a request for more time, this date was changed to January 5, 2021. After sending the appeal to the IND, then I have to wait for the court time.
Political statement:
Fascism lay in Dutch society, all it needed was a spark to ignite it.
My opinion on the terrorist religion of Islam is clear, as I made clear in two political statements; https://www.indymedia.nl/node/48656
https://www.indymedia.nl/node/48628
However, I believe that the assassination of Theodoor van Gogh in 2004 became an excuse for the fascists to increase their power in the country. The Wilders Fascist Party used social propaganda of such murder to brainwash the society, in order to awaken the dormant fascism of the Dutch society. By confiscating the propaganda of such a murder, the party convinced large sections of society that the country was in danger of Islamization; In fact, without the use of such murder as a tool, this party would never have been able to establish executive power in the country. This is a big lie, the Netherlands or Europe has never been in danger of being Islamized. There is a danger of Islamization, just because the existence of the fascists is tied to the existence of Islam, the fascists are the biggest proponents of the Islamization of Europe because they need to use Islam to convince society that something needs to be done. The terrorist religion of Islam only has become just became cover for fascists to hide their racist face towards immigrants. In fact, when we look at history, we find that Islam and fascism have hit immigrants equally hard. "Islam is a terrorist ideology, Islam is not the culture of immigrants, Islam is not the history of immigrants." Shame on so-called anti-fascists who gives platform to Islamists and defend Islam behind the stupid words such as Islamophobia. I believe that the political position of the so-called anti-fascists in the Netherlands is not in favor of the immigrants but it is in collusion with the fascists. The correct position of the anti-fascists in netherlands must be against Islam and against fascism, only then will the fascists lose their position in using Islam against the immigrants. In fact, it is the fault of the so-called anti-fascist also, that such situation exist, because the anti-fascists in the Netherlands could not take the right position on Islam and immigrants, unfortunately this wrong position still continues strongly.
The growth of fascism in the Netherlands was predictable:
1- Majority of a so-called anti-fascist movement that is incapable of taking the right stance against fascist propaganda.
2- The destruction of the proletarian movement, which (proletariat) is the most reliable enemy against fascism.
3- Existence of the majority who are the bourgeoisie and the micro-bourgeoisie with the ideas of neoliberalism.
4- An oligarchic regime that seeks to maximize its power towards totalitarianism.
It is true that we anarchists do not believe in parliament and government, but these are signs that the Dutch oligarchy is moving more and more towards fascism; a more dangerous issue is the silence of society, which shows that a fascist oligarchy can grow easily in this way. Suffice it to look at the parliament of the Dutch oligarchic regime, they are all either publicly fascists or some stupid liberals hiding behind different titles, there is nothing else. The time of uprising has come, fascism has taken over the whole country, you may not see it, but I and many other immigrants experience it every day.
Abtin Parsa
29 December 2020
kan die abtin parsa
kan die abtin parsa verheerlijking nu eens ophouden?
Response to a comrade
Dear Abtin,
I appreciate that you bring yourselve in and contribute where you stand. This is important for us anarchists - we need to struggle where we stand. I must say however I have some reservations about the way you write about a movement in a country where you have been only a couple of months. I do see some problems too with the position of some (and read that clear, some) antifascists, turning a blind eye to migrant and radical islamic organisations with fascist agenda's (like for instance the Grey Wolves, salafists etc.). These groups have their own agency and are just as responsible for their actions as white people. The measuring scale is reaching from libertarian to authoritarian.
I think it is unfair to say that the "political position of the so-called anti-fascists in the Netherlands is not in favor of the immigrants but it is in collusion with the fascists." I think your critique is partly valid, but you seem to make no distinction between different parts of the antifascist movement and dismissive towards is as a whole. A movement that is actually, as you put it yourself, supposed to revolt. But due to your seeming lack of faith, who do you suggest should revolt?
The time of uprising has come, fascism has taken over the whole country, you may not see it, but I and many other immigrants experience it every day. Also I think this statement will lead us nowhere. What are you actually suggesting. If we, as anarchists, believe that revolution, that is social revolution, should come from the people, then how is it exactly that this should look like if "the whole country has been taken over by fascism" or that the "proletariat"' as you suppose "has been destroyed" and that "the majority who are the bourgeoisie and the micro-bourgeoisie with the ideas of neoliberalism". Because I wonder who then is to revolt if it's not the antifascsts, there is no proletariat and the majority of society is bourgeois or petit-bourgois? And how is that revolt ever going to lead to a succesfull and effective change (say a social revolution, if that revolution is not made by the people, but by a small minority)?
I am an antifascist and a revolutionary anarchist. I do think that you are right by stating that there is a threat of fascism, this goes not only for the Netherlands, but for many European countries. That however, doesn't call for a direct "uprsing", but for thoughtfull work, movement building and reconnecting with society. Our movement has bumped its head into the walls of repression without being prepared and having no anchoring in society before. However 'right' one might be at that moment, it leads to nothing else but defeat. Part of our weakness lies in our isolation: our lack of connection with and anchorage in society. To regain this however is asking for painstakingly slow work of which the fruits are sometimes hard to see.
December 29th, Tommy Ryan
Hi, the fact that there is no
Hi, the fact that there is no revolutionary uprising yet means there is no free will. Otherwise You could start an uprising at any time. And a free will is the basic of anarchism. I am a Pauline christian. Take a look at Romans 13:1-7 and be shocked. nice to meet you.
also the DDOS attack lately
also the DDOS attack lately on indymedia excludes a free will. A free will means that you could predict such an attack beforehand as you can predict the exact date and location of your birth and death.
and what does your anarchist
and what does your anarchist guide to the galaxy say about the 200 trillions of locusts in Revelation 9 that will torture mankind? Are you supposed to make a deal with them?