|
|  |
How Much Does A Mercenary Cost?
Sudhama Ranganathan - 24.04.2010 00:36
When the Bush Administration decided for the American public that there would be no fair bidding process to ensure the best possible deal for the taxpayers in return for support services provided during the War in Iraq they signed us on for more than just what is at face value. We know the American people are on the hook to Halliburton, its subsidiaries and all its sub-contractors for billions of dollars as long as we are in Iraq. This includes whoever Halliburton chooses for hotel services, food supplies and of course their private security contractors. Since 9/11 American concerns over private security, their costs (financial and otherwise) and their role in our national security have come under scrutiny.
US troops put their lives on the lines every day in precarious circumstances all around the world. No greater is this sacrifice displayed than in Iraq. They have sacrificed mental health, physical health and for 4,500 their time here on earth to do the job of serving their nation. As Americans we value our troops and never forget what they relinquish.
The pay they receive seems small especially when compared to the tasks they perform. How much is it worth to put ones life on the line for one's country? How much are they worth to us as fellow countrymen and women on whose behalf they risk their lives? What's fair pay?
Our men and women in uniform serve for country first; nonetheless they deserve the best for their service. For an unmarried soldier receiving the pay commensurate with Iraq war service with the rank of sergeant receives roughly $85 per day. If they are married that pay doubles to $170 per day. At the top of the pay scale is General David Petraeus making a reported $493 per day which is about $180,000 annually.
Halliburton gets its money for services provided in Iraq from the US taxpayers they then subcontract companies like the Regency Hotels and ESS foods to provide services underneath them. They in turn hire private security firms to protect them and their interests in Iraq. Thus, those private security firms are getting paid via taxpayer dollars funneled down through Halliburton's no bid payments.
One of these companies is the infamous Blackwater security firm. Blackwater is sub-contracted to provide security, train personnel and oversee command centers for these firms among other things. The average pay US taxpayers are dishing out to Blackwater personnel is much higher than what we pay for our military. That average pay is roughly $600 per day. Once you add on costs and service fees the rate we dole out increases.
How much? The pay once costs and fees are included is $815 dollars a day in US citizen's taxpayer dollars, and that's for a mere operator. For a middle manager the average fee is $945 per day. When getting up to the level of senior managers we're paying $1,075 a day. Thus US taxpayers are paying senior managers at Blackwater overseeing a team of just 34 people more than double what we are paying General David Petraeus per day. Something isn’t right there.
In terms of private security and national security concerns it doesn't stop with Blackwater's exorbitant fees in the middle of a recession and their well publicized less than disciplined behavior. There is another perhaps more insidious aspect of corporate militarism and its relationship to US interests. It was revealed in 2007 that about half of our National Clandestine Services operations (black ops) are also being carried out by private firms. That's right, top secret government spy services are being handled by special interest corporate firms like Lockheed-Martin, Raytheon and others.
Of course we don't know exactly how much is being paid them as that is labeled "classified." We do know that the black ops community has an interesting way of acquiring taxpayer funds. Here is a quote from a paper written by someone who investigated these interesting phenomena:
"The CIA has the unique legal ability among all US government departments and agencies to generate funds through appropriations of other federal government agencies and other sources 'without regard to any provisions of law' and without regard to the intent behind Congressional appropriations. Every year, billions of dollars of Congressional appropriations are diverted from their Congressionally sanctioned purposes to the CIA and DoD based intelligence agencies without knowledge of the public and with the collusion of Congressional leaders. The covert world of ‘black programs’ acts with virtual impunity, overseen and regulated by itself, funding itself through secret slush funds, and is free of the limitations that come from Congressional oversight, proper auditing procedures and public scrutiny." The CIA black budget is annually in the vicinity of 1.1 trillion dollars – a truly staggering figure when one considers that the DoD budget for 2004 will be approximately 380 billion dollars. ( http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=CIA#Outsourcing_the_NCS)
So when we hear of millions of dollars being unaccounted for and mysteriously missing from agencies like HUD and others, it's most likely not accounting errors. Those agencies, which are effectively being looted of taxpayer funds that we sent people to Washington to grant, are forced to simply say "well, we don't know what happened to those millions of dollars." This would account for a lot of so called Government inefficiency as far as the way the books look because there is no transparency. The CIA polices itself with regards to this practice with absolutely no oversight. We know the high prices we are forced to pay for security details in Iraq. How much do you want to guess we pay for unregulated spy services? My guess is it's even higher.
We've seen with the recent financial crisis what leaving any industry to police itself can lead to. Would we allow anyone we were doing business with or handling thousands of dollars of our money to do with as they wish with no transparency at all or repercussions for their actions? Of course not, but that's exactly what we have been forced to do here and the figures are in the trillions of dollars. “Just trust us” is what we are being told. This is from the same people who helped sell us on WMD in Iraq.
We are in a time of economic upheaval and need to know now more than ever where and how our money is being spent. How else are we to know when it is being wasted? 50% of our national black ops are in the hands of special interest groups who help prepare intelligence reports for the White House. Are we to just believe blindly that nothing beneficial to those companies is being slipped in? With no oversight how can we know? What the KGB couldn’t accomplish corporate America has and that’s to effectively penetrate the CIA. Hopefully our new president charged with bringing change will reverse our intelligence services being effectively infiltration by the same special interests he and his opponent campaigned so hard against.
To read about my inspiration for this article go to www.lawsuitagainstuconn.com
 E-Mail: uconnharassment@gmail.com  Website: http://www.lawsuitagainstuconn.com
|
| Lees meer over: vrijheid, repressie & mensenrechten | | aanvullingen | |
