|
|  |
Grounds for International Summons
Åke Tyvi - 05.01.2010 11:44
State of Finland has not been able to guarantee neutral and fair trial or investigation on crimes.
STATEMENT FOR THE COURT / GROUNDS FOR INTERNATIONAL SUMMONS
January 5th, 2010
GROUNDS FOR INTERNATIONAL SUMMONS
State of Finland has not been able to guarantee neutral and fair trial during 15 years long period, in which time all crimes and violations has taken place in Finland by Finnish Government Officials and private persons.
Actions taken by Finnish Police are violating several laws. Economical frauds (property frauds, inheritance law violations, constitution etc.) [Heikki Tyvi, Nina Harris], property crimes based on frauds (personal property losses, faking debt as inheritance against one’s wish [Master of Law Tapio Kantola, Heikki Tyvi - Vocational Qualification in Business and Administration]) are not inspected when reported, nor are loses caused due to false judgments inspected or compensated [Toijala District Court Judge Tarja Rossi [1.1.2010 ]].
District Court systematically uses formula of requesting to append Application for Summons at accuracy not relevant for setting a Court Day. At District Court notaries are inspecting frauds instead of a competent judge. Appending 15 years documentation for Court could mean several days task to copy the evidence, not to mention the costs of copying these set several times during this period of time. And still the answer remains the same; no reason for legal actions, even in cases were solicitor have inspected case and requested it to be inspected as a property fraud. When case evidence are against local Police [detective police Timo Välimäki, constable Jari Jakobsson] via Central Criminal Police to Finnish Security Police and Ministry of Interior, there is no hope for these people assisting in civil cases against Government Officials.
When Finnish Solicitors refuse taking cases against legal representatives and police, as solicitors are in fear of loosing their charge to get hired on Government Post, and as Finnish Government is paying legal expenses on the behalf of their clients to solicitors in most cases, is the system build in a way preventing law and justice to happen.
All I have is 15 years of Crimes Against Humanity committed by Finnish Police and Legal System and some civilians. However, as I have examined how Police and our government functions, plus few other similar cases, I may only confirm my case against Finland to International Criminal Court of Justice once again. District Court blocks cases in Finland. They rarely reach Court of Appeals and never seem to go as far as Supreme Court. The Office of Attorney General has not seen the crimes solicitor saw. These people cause bureaucracy and their only task seems to be making sure the forms were filled correctly and procedures were followed in stead of inspecting the crimes involved.
As a result of all these acts people loose their property and eventually their case evidence as they are usually driven to live on streets without work, home or family. In this way Finnish State may appeal into mental decease in the end, when people having sufferance from this State’s discretion have just had enough of it and start using anarchy in protecting their legal rights or what is left from it.
It is not very harmful for Finnish Legal System to play with some African and judge him from Crimes Against Humanity at the same time these people have not cleaned their own back-yard. And based on the level of inspection we already know the result may be very questionable, but at least we do not have death penalty in Finland, in stead our government officials will arrange life time lasting suffering as a poor. Such cases shown on International Media is like the tail swinging the god; they draw attention and move focus into something else in stead of handling domestic civil affairs according to Laws.
The juridical administration and police provides legal security only to government officials and lawyers, but not civilians. Legal security has bee proved not to a fundamental right of Finnish Citizen. Even Constitution of Finland claims, that everyone is entitled to have his or her case heard by a court or an authority appropriately and without undue delay is practice different and claims only decorative clauses without any real content.
Constitutional right to have a decision affecting his or her rights or obligations to be reviewed by a court or another judicial authority does not fulfil either. Constitution contains a fundamental provision on the guarantees of a fair trial and good public administration and al this turns out to be is a big lie based on 15 years field experience. Such most important guarantees like the openness of proceedings, the right to be heard, the right to receive a reasoned decision and the right to appeal against the decision never take place as court handling are dismissed, revoked and blocked. Openness of proceedings is a provable lie as people have to publish their cases on internet in a fear of officials disturbing their life for not being settled in front of court. Openness of proceedings is lie in an other respect as well; freedom of a written word does not occur in Finland as case evidence must either be published openly abroad or in a known administrator web-site in preventing police or officials removing case evidence.
Judicial administration can not consists of the independent courts of law as only prosecutions from police are accepted in stead of based on civilian requests as well, prosecution service is one sided, enforcement authorities have not been competent enough or are focusing on such formalities as police and court having filled forms correctly and followed procedures in stead on inspecting the issue itself, the enforcement of judgments are not inspected at the level they should, and a good example of The Finnish Court and Prison Service is Kari Uoti (Doctor of Law) as an expert of Finnish Human Rights violations having faced HR violations himself as well. And we did already handled Bar Association and the other avenues of legal aid, who seem to be State parasites fed by the State Automata and not willing to kill the milking cow.
I have seen 15 years time how State of Finland and its officials have been able to ruin six inheritance property plus almost my personal heath. There has been times were I have spent four or five days from seven day week in writing correspondence with government officials, and this has not been on my wish. I think it has been time to put an end either to this state despotism and end this madness were state machinery is simply killing its civilians by committing acts inhuman.
Thus I appeal to International Criminal Court and all those reading this letter to end the despotism this State practices against its citizen.
Gentlemen, can I be this wrong with the credit I have? I do understand I am not perfect, nor is my case, but this government actions is pure madness to an average level citizen trying to protect their legal rights!
Åke Tyvi
B.eng (Software Engineering), > 410.25 academic credits and still going on
University Student
Delivery; Press.
|
| Lees meer over: europa media | | aanvullingen | |
