english
nederlands
Indymedia NL
Independent Media Centre of the Netherlands
Indymedia NL is an independent free communication organisation. Indymedia offers an alternative approach to the news by using an open publishing method for text, images, video and audio.
> contact > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
Search

 
All Words
Any Word
Contains Media:
Only images
Only video
Only audio

Dossiers
Agenda
CHAT!
LINKS

European NewsReal

MDI's complaint against Indymedia.nl
Courtcase Deutsche Bahn vs. Indymedia.nl
Topics
anti-fascisme / racisme
europa
feminisme
gentechnologie
globalisering
kunst, cultuur en muziek
media
militarisme
natuur, dier en mens
oranje
vrijheid, repressie & mensenrechten
wereldcrisis
wonen/kraken
zonder rubriek
Events
G8
Oaxaca
Schinveld
Schoonmakers-Campagne
Help
Tips for newbies
A short intro into Indymedia NL
The policy of Indymedia NL
How to join?
Donate
Support Indymedia NL with donations!
Lawsuits cost a lot of money, we appreciate every (euro)cent you can spare!

You can also direct your donation to Dutch bank account 94.32.153 on behalf of Stichting Vrienden van Indymedia, Amsterdam (IBAN: NL41 PSTB 0009 4321 53)
Indymedia Network

www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa
ambazonia
canarias
estrecho / madiaq
kenya
nigeria
south africa

Canada
hamilton
london, ontario
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor
winnipeg

East Asia
burma
jakarta
japan
manila
qc

Europe
alacant
andorra
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
bristol
bulgaria
croatia
cyprus
estrecho / madiaq
euskal herria
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
lille
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
netherlands
nice
norway
oost-vlaanderen
paris/île-de-france
poland
portugal
romania
russia
scotland
sverige
switzerland
thessaloniki
toulouse
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
west vlaanderen

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
chile sur
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso

Oceania
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
oceania
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india
mumbai

United States
arizona
arkansas
atlanta
austin
baltimore
big muddy
binghamton
boston
buffalo
charlottesville
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
danbury, ct
dc
hampton roads, va
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
idaho
ithaca
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
omaha
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
seattle
tallahassee-red hills
tampa bay
tennessee
united states
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
armenia
beirut
israel
palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
discussion
fbi/legal updates
indymedia faq
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
volunteer
Credits
This site is produced by volunteers using free software where possible.

The system we use is available from:mir.indymedia.de
an alternative is available from: active.org.au/doc

Thanks to indymedia.de and mir-coders for creating and sharing mir!

Contact:
info @ indymedia.nl
Nuclear debate hotting up in Germany again
Diet Simon - 15.02.2007 05:06

Debate is heating up in Germany over keeping or scrapping nuclear power production and over what to do with nuclear waste, which is dangerously radioactive for a million years.

Chancellor Angelika Merkel’s CDU conservatives want the establishment of dumps speeded up and nuclear power generation extended.

Their parliamentary group has teamed up with Merkel’s office, the economics ministry and experts from the state of Lower Saxony to make “an understanding offer” to the Social Democrats (SPD), the junior partners in Berlin.

“Solving the final repository issue quickly and purpose-oriented” is the title of a paper drawn up by the group, who say it’s aimed at making the debate more objective.

For the first time, the CDU suggests in it that international experts of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development monitor the exploration of a salt deposit in the northern village of Gorleben as a final dump and assess all findings in the light of state-of-the-art science and technology.

By the end of 2008 the OECD nuclear experts should report their analyses to the German parliament so that it could “make a durable and reliable decision”, the paper suggests.

Simultaneously the safety criteria for a nuclear repository, which date from 1983, should be developed further according to international standards.

The conservatives hope this will win the agreement of the Social Democrats because Sigmar Gabriel, the environment minister and a member of that party, put forward similar ideas last year.

“We have to get out of the trenches,” says a CDU MP who helped develop the paper. Maria Flachsbarth insists that there be no more delay in seeking a final repository location.

This was why the exploration stop in Gorleben had to be rescinded immediately.

Flachsbarth also wants the process speeded up to turn a former iron mine, “Schacht Konrad” near Salzgitter, into a repository for weak and medium-active waste. Present plans are for Schacht Konrad to start operating as a dump in 2013.

The conservatives reject any search for an alternative to Gorleben. “No new selection procedure is needed, neither on the basis of atomic law in connection with international obligations nor with view to the practice in other countries.”

In their paper the conservatives also pick up on demands by local government politicians in the Gorleben area that repository locations be given offset payments for the “special burdens” they carry.

For this purpose, the paper suggests, the state and federal levels of government should reach an agreement with the power industry. The paper has no proposals on the amounts to be paid.

But Flachsbarth points out that nuclear power stations make big profits which amount to substantial tax revenues for the local governments where they are located. As repository locations neither Gorleben nor the town of Salzgitter received any additional tax revenue. This was why offset payments were responsible and desirable.

Christian Wulff, the CDU premier of Lower Saxony, where Gorleben lies, has again demanded a quick decision on it. “The exploration has to be completed now to arrive at a result,” he said. He warned against “hasty” plans for other locations.

“I don’t think a trial bore will be made anywhere else before [Gorleben’s] unsuitability is established.”

The Social Democrats have been saying they want to look for possible other sites.

In the pact that is the basis of the coalition government the conservatives and social democrats agreed to “quickly” resolve the issue of a possible final nuclear dump.

Two recent events have heated up the energy debate between the governing parties, Russia’s stoush wit Belarus over the natural gas price and the climate crisis.

The CDU wants Germany’s 17 nuclear power stations to run longer than agreed with the industry by the previous government of Social Democrats and Greens, honoured by the present government, though grudgingly by the CDU, because the two parties couldn’t agree on anything different.

Under the coalition agreement the last German nuke has to be switched off in 2020. Four reactors are due to come off the grid during this legislative period which, if it runs the full course, ends in late 2009.

But the atom power law allows running times to be transferred from newer to older plants. The RWE and EnBW power companies have already applied for longer times for two old plants.

The CDU regards longer use of nuclear power as inevitable, arguing – wrongly, anti-nuclear activists insist – that it doesn’t produce carbon dioxide.

The president of the Federation of German Industry, Jürgen Thumann, also wants the decision to abandon nuclear power reversed. “As step 1 we should extend the running times of our nuclear power stations,” he says.

The exit decision had agreed an average operating period of 32 years, he noted, whereas in countries surrounding Germany average running times had been increased to 60 years.

Running nuclear stations longer than now scheduled would gain time for the further development of alternative energies, in which Germany was already a world market leader, Thumann argued. The ultimate aim was to reduce dependence on nuclear power.

The SPD continues strictly to oppose longer operation and to already declaring Gorleben the final dump.

The head of the SPD parliamentary group, Peter Struck, has suggested “a final repository for Europe”, which the conservatives reject. He spoke of the “weaknesses” of the Gorleben salt.

The idea was also rejected by the Federal Radiation Protection Agency (BfS). “The risk is too great that in the end the safety standards are lower than ours,” said BfS president, Wolfram König.

Moreover, Germany could the also become the destination of nuclear waste transports, he added. There was already big interest in Gorleben abroad, he said.

The agency says neither German nor European Union legislation would allow a Europe-wide final dump.

The idea of international dumping kept popping up in recent years, coming mostly from the power producers.

Some German and other nations’ waste is already going to Russia where, according to anti-nuclear activists, it’s being dumped in the open air under catastrophic conditions. Another country occasionally mentioned as a final dumpsite is Australia.

Meanwhile the neighbouring Swiss have also started debating what to do with the nuclear waste that has accumulated there in 30 years.

Their energy minister, Moritz Leuenberger, intends to let all Swiss have a say in the choice of a final dump. A possible location near Zurich was pulled back after protests. A site is to be chosen by 2017 and be operating by the middle of the century.

Although Switzerland has sustainable energy resources, such as solar, and although the energy saving potential hasn’t been exploited by a long chalk, there’s already fresh discussion about another nuke.

Meanwhile across the border Germans are worried that Benken, just three kilometres into Switzerland, will be the final repository location.

The Germans are concerned that they might not have any influence on the proposed storage of waste 500 metres underground there.


 

Read more about: natuur, dier en mens

supplements
Court strikes down UK nuclear decision 
xxxx - 15.02.2007 13:09


A High Court judge in London has ruled that the British government's decision to back the building of new nuclear power stations was unlawful. Mr Justice Sullivan quashed the government decision.


 http://www.rte.ie/news/2007/0215/nuclear.html
supplements
> indymedia.nl > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
DISCLAIMER: Indymedia NL uses the 'open posting' principle to promote freedom of speech. The news (text, images, audio and video) posted in the open newswire of Indymedia NL remains the property of the author who posted it. The views in these postings do not necesseraly reflect the views of the editorial team of Indymedia NL. Furthermore, it is not always possible to guarantee the accuracy of the postings.