english
nederlands
Indymedia NL
Independent Media Centre of the Netherlands
Indymedia NL is an independent free communication organisation. Indymedia offers an alternative approach to the news by using an open publishing method for text, images, video and audio.
> contact > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
Search

 
All Words
Any Word
Contains Media:
Only images
Only video
Only audio

Dossiers
Agenda
CHAT!
LINKS

European NewsReal

MDI's complaint against Indymedia.nl
Courtcase Deutsche Bahn vs. Indymedia.nl
Topics
anti-fascisme / racisme
europa
feminisme
gentechnologie
globalisering
kunst, cultuur en muziek
media
militarisme
natuur, dier en mens
oranje
vrijheid, repressie & mensenrechten
wereldcrisis
wonen/kraken
zonder rubriek
Events
G8
Oaxaca
Schinveld
Schoonmakers-Campagne
Help
Tips for newbies
A short intro into Indymedia NL
The policy of Indymedia NL
How to join?
Donate
Support Indymedia NL with donations!
Lawsuits cost a lot of money, we appreciate every (euro)cent you can spare!

You can also direct your donation to Dutch bank account 94.32.153 on behalf of Stichting Vrienden van Indymedia, Amsterdam (IBAN: NL41 PSTB 0009 4321 53)
Indymedia Network

www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa
ambazonia
canarias
estrecho / madiaq
kenya
nigeria
south africa

Canada
hamilton
london, ontario
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor
winnipeg

East Asia
burma
jakarta
japan
manila
qc

Europe
alacant
andorra
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
bristol
bulgaria
croatia
cyprus
estrecho / madiaq
euskal herria
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
lille
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
netherlands
nice
norway
oost-vlaanderen
paris/île-de-france
poland
portugal
romania
russia
scotland
sverige
switzerland
thessaloniki
toulouse
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
west vlaanderen

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
chile sur
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso

Oceania
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
oceania
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india
mumbai

United States
arizona
arkansas
atlanta
austin
baltimore
big muddy
binghamton
boston
buffalo
charlottesville
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
danbury, ct
dc
hampton roads, va
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
idaho
ithaca
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
omaha
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
seattle
tallahassee-red hills
tampa bay
tennessee
united states
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
armenia
beirut
israel
palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
discussion
fbi/legal updates
indymedia faq
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
volunteer
Credits
This site is produced by volunteers using free software where possible.

The system we use is available from:mir.indymedia.de
an alternative is available from: active.org.au/doc

Thanks to indymedia.de and mir-coders for creating and sharing mir!

Contact:
info @ indymedia.nl
On precairous activism
eyfa - 10.02.2005 15:29

As part of a process of promoting the Precair Forum, people both inside and outside of the coordinating groups are invited to construct short (up to 600 or so word) 'provocations', texts which discuss ideas and topics that people feel need to be reflected upon.

for more: check out www.precairforum.nl (Dutch/English)


Precarious Activism
or
"We cannot write a provocation because we have no time to think"

For those who don't know, eyfa is an organisation that mainly deals with fundraising and transfer of know-how for grassroots groups and
activists collectives. Because eyfa activities are a way to transfer resources where we want them to end up (i.e. with alternative media, grassroots anti-capitalists collectives or environmental projects in Eastern and Western Europe) and because we work collectively in the office in an attempt to put our ideals into practice, we see what we do on the one hand as activism (or providing a basis for activism). But on the other hand, it is an unstable and badly paid job with no long-term security, welfare rights or adequate health care provision, and at the same time, our activities (especially project funding), allow other people to get funds to finance their activist projects, but under the same unstable and badly paid conditions (i.e. we provide no structural or core funding and therefore little 'stability'). In that way, we are in a precarious situation and foster precarity ourselves.

When we were invited by the organisers of this meeting to write a provocation, the reaction by the eyfa office team was a small silence, followed by an uncomfortable 'that's a great idea, yes, hm...' and, finally, the so well-known eyfa remark: 'Let's see if we have time, you know there's the funding deadline in February and the Winter Meeting to organise and we are short of staff at the moment...' and so forth. This is why, when we thought of writing a provocation on the issue of precarious work, instead of looking outside we thought we'd like to reflect on the precarity within, so to speak.

If this precarity concept is about the consequences of the welfare
state's safety nets being removed in the general framework of
neo-liberalisation, we can of course criticise McDonalds for not giving its employees maternity leaves and fixed contracts. However, which activist working in self-created structures do you know, who has a stable job with paid maternity leave? You will probably find very few, and those that do are usually to be found in the university sector or within welfare provisions, both of which are being privatised or dismantled as we speak.

An even more interesting question is, would you like to have such a job? Maybe most activists trying to live "outside of the market rules" do not even aspire to such security because
a) we see insecurity as part of the socio-economic system we fight and the situation can therefore not be helped anyway, or
b) we believe in the widespread idea within anti-capitalist communities that financial stability does not mean "security" or sustainability, where actions such as squatting and permanent campaigning or grassroots organisations have their own structures to create sustainability within the biggest imaginable precarity, and permanency within constant change.

Two questions arise:
1) Is precarity an inseparable element of organising life outside the State or the Market, both being based on the ideology that wants you to be scared of the future and seek security in money, mortgage and marriage and if so, can we define activism as 'precarious' at all?
2) How is it possible to organise life outside the State or the Market in the first place?

Following on from these reflections, and since this is a provocation, we pose some questions here which we do not have final answers to either.

Precarity at the personal level

Activism/resisting capitalism is a hard and unstable form of "work" (i.e. activities you undertake).

Activism is unstable because projects and people change, squats get evicted and there are new things to organise and people to network with all the time. Some (not all) activists, choose a certain "lifestyle" and way to interact with other people - a precarious (as in constantly changing) way of going about your life, with all its good and bad things.
- What does that do for you and your collectives and how do you/your collectives deal with that?
- What are the positive or negative aspects of this constant flux?
- What structures can/could create sustainability within the biggest imaginable precarity? How to improve these structures?

Activism is hard because we feel there is so much to do and because in organising an anti-whatever gathering or a campaign, running a people's kitchen or planning an action we tend to overexploit ourselves.
- Is this because we like it, or do we think it is necessary to achieve our goal?
- Does this behaviour conflict with being "sustainable" about what we do?
- Do we believe that 'Everybody must have projects all the time" and therefore just live what be say we fight, i.e. a work ethic we do not recognise as such?

Finantial precarity and personal self-exploitation

The reality for most activists is that you have to look for some part-time job outside anti-capitalist communities and within the market structure, next to your activist work, to generate some sustainable income. A more ‘pragmatic activism’. But the jobs that you then end up doing are often very precarious (e.g. cleaning , working in bars on a 0 hour contract etc etc).
But assuming we do have relative agency in choosing our living and working conditions, one critique point, and a provocation to activists, would be: why do we deliberately live the reality we claim to fight? Why if 'overactive' in self-created structures we pay ourselves little money, work 10 hours a day and we do not separate our personal life from work?

- Is it because we believe the apparent separation of work and free time is only maintained because 'free' time is needed to recreate labour power, in a capitalist society?
- Or is it also a sign of lack of history and the ignorance of past social struggles - to throw away the achievements of a once radical labour movement, such as the 8 hour day and adequate social and health security provisions?
- Or is it just a reflection of the changing nature of work and we have no choice in the matter?
- Do we simply live a capitalist work ethic and fail to see our own reproduction of what we criticise in the new precarity, that our life is our job, that we accept the fact that we have to continually reinvent ourselves to compete, that we ignore those that cannot do the same (the old, the sick, those that don't fit 'the norm')?
- Or are all these questions based on the wrong assumption, that activism can be precarious in the first place, i.e. because we are in a position to "decide" to live precariously to pursue our ideals which means our precarity fundamentally differs from non-activists-not-chosen precarity? How are these differences of economic position and privilege or subjectivity reflected in the precarity discourse?

Financial precarity and collectives

Money has undoubtedly helped a lot of amazing projects to kick in, but sometimes groups that get a lot of money somehow 'de-radicalise'. Some really amazing projects and social struggles are alive and well with no cash injections, and some are well-funded but unsuccessful…
In relation to that, fundraising being one of eyfa's activities means we are contributing to make radical projects happen by helping them get… money, which is admittedly a controversial idea. We are constantly coming back to the question of: Which of the above-paragraph situations is more true? what can money do for activist groups and resistance? What can it not do? And unless you resort to simplistic answers those are hard to answer questions.

Then as far as groups are made of people financial precarity at a personal level affects collectives - sometimes amazing projects coming to an end because people get tired of having to work in bars to sustain their activism.

Does individual financial precarity affect the nature and composition of collectives in the first place, and the shapes of our struggles, since it is harder to participate for somebody that is not as comfortable with being precarious as the young-male-healthy-legal-with no dependants type can be?


No time to think

The question of activist-precarity-as-a-choice aside, fact is all these 'precarities' can be detrimental to our physical (can you afford the dentist or physio?) and mental health (stress, burn-our, overspanning). But just as tragic: it leads to a lack of time to think. What is the point in doing an action, if you had no time to sit down beforehand to discuss and hopefully conclude rightly that this action is useful in the promotion of social change?
How do we know that our actions do not support the status quo if we don't have time to carefully weigh them up against other possibilities?
Many groups (including us), have the tendency to neglect long-term planning and strategies in favour of the short-term campaign, action or summit-run.
If we assume that precarity leads to 'less time to think' (maybe for some seasonal workers it means more time to think) and if we assume that our precarity and lack of time to think is in our own hands, we would be well advised to make time to think, not alone, but together with others.

We see these questions above as interesting intersections between the current precarity discourses and eyfa's reflection processes (see more about those on our website, or ask). Redefinition is ongoing...and see, in the end we found time to write this.
 
supplements
> indymedia.nl > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
DISCLAIMER: Indymedia NL uses the 'open posting' principle to promote freedom of speech. The news (text, images, audio and video) posted in the open newswire of Indymedia NL remains the property of the author who posted it. The views in these postings do not necesseraly reflect the views of the editorial team of Indymedia NL. Furthermore, it is not always possible to guarantee the accuracy of the postings.