english
nederlands
Indymedia NL
Independent Media Centre of the Netherlands
Indymedia NL is an independent free communication organisation. Indymedia offers an alternative approach to the news by using an open publishing method for text, images, video and audio.
> contact > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
Search

 
All Words
Any Word
Contains Media:
Only images
Only video
Only audio

Dossiers
Agenda
CHAT!
LINKS

European NewsReal

MDI's complaint against Indymedia.nl
Courtcase Deutsche Bahn vs. Indymedia.nl
Topics
anti-fascisme / racisme
europa
feminisme
gentechnologie
globalisering
kunst, cultuur en muziek
media
militarisme
natuur, dier en mens
oranje
vrijheid, repressie & mensenrechten
wereldcrisis
wonen/kraken
zonder rubriek
Events
G8
Oaxaca
Schinveld
Schoonmakers-Campagne
Help
Tips for newbies
A short intro into Indymedia NL
The policy of Indymedia NL
How to join?
Donate
Support Indymedia NL with donations!
Lawsuits cost a lot of money, we appreciate every (euro)cent you can spare!

You can also direct your donation to Dutch bank account 94.32.153 on behalf of Stichting Vrienden van Indymedia, Amsterdam (IBAN: NL41 PSTB 0009 4321 53)
Indymedia Network

www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa
ambazonia
canarias
estrecho / madiaq
kenya
nigeria
south africa

Canada
hamilton
london, ontario
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor
winnipeg

East Asia
burma
jakarta
japan
manila
qc

Europe
alacant
andorra
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
bristol
bulgaria
croatia
cyprus
estrecho / madiaq
euskal herria
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
lille
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
netherlands
nice
norway
oost-vlaanderen
paris/île-de-france
poland
portugal
romania
russia
scotland
sverige
switzerland
thessaloniki
toulouse
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
west vlaanderen

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
chile sur
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso

Oceania
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
oceania
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india
mumbai

United States
arizona
arkansas
atlanta
austin
baltimore
big muddy
binghamton
boston
buffalo
charlottesville
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
danbury, ct
dc
hampton roads, va
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
idaho
ithaca
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
omaha
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
seattle
tallahassee-red hills
tampa bay
tennessee
united states
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
armenia
beirut
israel
palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
discussion
fbi/legal updates
indymedia faq
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
volunteer
Credits
This site is produced by volunteers using free software where possible.

The system we use is available from:mir.indymedia.de
an alternative is available from: active.org.au/doc

Thanks to indymedia.de and mir-coders for creating and sharing mir!

Contact:
info @ indymedia.nl
transgenic maize introduced into EU market?
j. - 04.12.2003 13:59

EFSA issues opinions on new GM maize: NK 603 maize considered as safe as conventional maize

EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY

4 DECEMBER 2003

Embargoed until 4 December 2003, 18.00 CET

PRESS RELEASE

The European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA) Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) has published today two opinions on genetically modified (GM) maize NK603. The Panel has concluded that the herbicide-tolerant GM maize NK 603 is as safe as conventional maize and therefore that its placing on the market -- for import for processing and food or feed use-- is unlikely to have an adverse effect on human or animal health, or in this context, on the environment.

“These opinions have been requested as the first of a series of risk assessments of different GM plant varieties,” said Dr. Harry Kuiper, Chair of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). “Our Scientific Panel was recently asked to review the evidence presented on GM maize NK 603 in order to evaluate its safety. A comprehensive environmental assessment was not conducted as the applications for GM maize NK 603 concern only import and processing, but not cultivation of the maize. The risk assessment process included examination of: the DNA integrated into NK 603; the nature and safety of the target proteins produced by the transgenic event and; the possibility that the genetic modification may have influenced the safety, allergenicity and nutritional value of NK 603 in comparison with conventional maize.“ Having considered all of the evidence provided, the Panel concluded that NK 603 maize is as safe as conventional maize and therefore the placing on the market of NK 603 maize – for import for processing and food or feed use—is unlikely to have an adverse effect on human or animal health, or in this context, on the environment. Following EFSA’s scientific risk assessment, the Commission will draft proposals concerning the possible authorisation of NK 603 maize for consultation of the Member States in a Regulatory Committee.

Background

These opinions relate to the risk assessment of a new GM maize (NK603 “Roundup Ready” maize) and of food and feed products derived from it. This maize type has been genetically modified to provide tolerance to the herbicide glyphosate (commonly formulated as “Roundup”). The stated purpose of this modification is to allow farmers to manage weeds more effectively in maize fields during cultivation.

The risk assessment is based on two questions raised by the Commission related to applications for the placing of the maize on the market by Monsanto under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 on novel food and under Directive 2001/18/EC on the release of genetically modified organisms into the environment.

In the first question, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms was asked to assess the safety of foods and food ingredients derived from NK 603 maize, and in the second question, it was requested to determine whether there is any scientific reason to believe that the placing on the market of NK 603 maize, for import and processing, is likely to cause any adverse effects on human health, or in this context, on the environment. These questions followed two separate scientific assessments which were initially carried out in the Netherlands and Spain and subsequently evaluated by all other Member States. The EFSA assessment was requested by the Commission because of additional questions raised as a result of these Member State evaluations. EU legislation requires that, in such cases, EFSA should carry out a further assessment and provide an opinion.

In delivering these opinions the Panel considered the applications and additional information provided by the applicant and the specific questions and concerns raised by the Member States. At the request of the Commission, the Panel has provided two separate opinions. However, as both dossiers cover to a large extent the same issues, a single risk assessment has been provided for both opinions.

NK603 maize has been developed for resistance to “Roundup” herbicide by introducing a glyphosate tolerant gene. The risk assessment process was conducted using the 2003 EU scientific guidance for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed1.


The opinions are on the EFSA web site at:  http://www.efsa.eu.int/p_gmo_en.html


For more background information about the European Food Safety Authority, go to:
 http://www.efsa.eu.int/


1 EC, 2003. Guidance document for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed, prepared by the Joint Working Group on Novel Foods and GMOs, 6-7 March 2003.  http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/ssc/out327_en.pdf




 

Read more about: natuur, dier en mens

supplements
waardeloos onderzoek 
brp/ - 04.12.2003 14:11

"A comprehensive environmental assessment was not conducted as the applications for GM maize NK 603 concern only import and processing, but not cultivation of the maize."
Brinkhorst: ban op Amerikaans gen-voedsel oph 
link - 04.12.2003 14:38

Brinkhorst: ban op Amerikaans gen-voedsel opheffen
Gepubliceerd op woensdag 03 december 2003
 http://planet.nl/planet/show/id=62967/contentid=424645/sc=2ebb95
ter overweging 
04.12.2003 16:53

hoorde laatst een gesprek met een wetenschapper die zich ophield met de manipulatie van gewassen;zoals het mij ter oren kwam, ik vond de man heel reeël en realistisch spreken, daar niet van, hij zei een paar dingen waar ik zelf niet zo goed over uit kan,
- de kruisbestuiving met andere-/gelijksoortige gewassen
is onmogelijk
- de gemanipuleerde gewassen hebben geen overlevingskans op eigen kracht...

dan vraag ik me weer af, waarom durven ze deze gewassen dan in de waagschaal te werpen als voedselbevoorrading, misschien zelfs voor de hele wereld?
waarom zorg je er dan niet liever voor, dat dat wat heel is goed verzorgd gehandhaafd blijft en in zijn 'ras-waarden' sterk blijft, opdat je er inderdaad een voedselvoorraad op kan bouwen?

Een iets wat ik dan wčl leerde op school en wat ik dan ook wel weer eens hier kwijt wilde,is dat zoals het dan heet- heterogene bossen (=meerdere soorten bomen door elkaar/in dit geval) meer overlevings kans hebben (in de afweer van schimmels bv.), dan homo-gene bossen (=enkelvoudig soort/deze zijn kwetsbaarder in hun afweermechanisme en zodoende eerder geruďneerd en weggevaagd dan die heterogene-bossen).

en waarom zie je overal precies de mono-landbouw gehandhaaft blijven?
of heb ik zelf last van vreemde hersenspinsels, vooral omdat ik er vanzelf ook het fijne niet van weet?
European Agency Calls Biotech Corn Safe 
Associated Press, Fri, Dec. 05, 2003 - 05.12.2003 15:32

"Adding to pressure on European Union governments to lift their blockade on new biotech crops, the European Food Safety Authority said Thursday that Monsanto's Roundup Ready corn is as safe as conventional corn and "unlikely" to have any negative health effects." more,
 http://www.sunherald.com/mld/sunherald/business/7419018.htm
in februari op de markt misschien 
fwd/ - 05.12.2003 15:36

" The first GMO opinion from the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA) Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) will open the way for the Commission to draft proposals on authorising NK 603 maize for consultation by member states in a regulatory committee, the decision could be as early as January or February next year. "  http://www.foodnavigator.com/news/news-NG.asp?id=48227
supplements
> indymedia.nl > search > archive > help > join > publish news > open newswire > disclaimer > chat
DISCLAIMER: Indymedia NL uses the 'open posting' principle to promote freedom of speech. The news (text, images, audio and video) posted in the open newswire of Indymedia NL remains the property of the author who posted it. The views in these postings do not necesseraly reflect the views of the editorial team of Indymedia NL. Furthermore, it is not always possible to guarantee the accuracy of the postings.