|
|  |
911 coup poging tegen Bush?
henk - 02.08.2002 22:24
een heleboel
I only bring up the following, because it points to political action that we can take to try to prevent political chaos in the near future. LaRouche, presidential candidate, who was in military intelligence, I think, and who has maintained ties to the intelligence community ever since he left, has a press release on who was ultimately responsible for the Sep 11 attacks - it's at  http://larouchein2004.net/pages/writings/2001/011223zbigsept11.htm -- . He says it was an attempted coup against Bush, which is still being attempted via dupes', McCain and Lieberman's, efforts to pressure Bush to attack Iraq. [I’ll try to get one or 2 follow-up posts up on McCain and Lieberman right after this, along with suggested political action]. Here are some excerpts. I haven't read the whole thing yet. --
. Zbigniew Brzezinski And September 11th - Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. December 23, 2001 This paper is the introduction to a special report which is available to order [See link above].
For those who are able and willing to accept the way in which history actually works, the evidence provided by the U.S. events of Sept. 11th permitted but one concise conclusion: The crucial developments inside the U.S.A., between the bookends of approximately 08:45 and 11:00 h EDT, were a reflection of an attempted military coup d'état against the U.S. government of President George W. Bush. I first reached that conclusion early during the first hour of that interval, while I was being interviewed in a nearly two-hour, live radio broadcast. My broadcast remarks during that interval have become an important integral part of those developments themselves, not only inside the U.S.A., but in their radiating effects throughout much of the world besides.[1] … The first, most ominous possibility, was that the relevant, pre-established security safeguards, which had been instituted earlier against such types of contingencies, had, previously, simply been allowed to deteriorate to virtual non-relevance, that itself a very dangerous state of national security, or, The second, more likely possibility, was that some top-ranking U.S. military personnel "at the switch," turned off a significant part of those standing security pre-arrangements which would have been sufficient, at a minimum, to defeat, at the least, the attack upon the Pentagon itself.[2] For any person with knowledge comparable to my experience in the field of strategic ballistic missile defense-policy [LaRouche was the first to propose the Strategic Defense Initiative to Reagan in the early 80s to end nuclear blackmail], the attack on the Pentagon, with the thermonuclear implications of that attack in and of itself, pointed to the second alternative.
. To see the relevant evidence clearly, the reader must recognize that there exist not one, but three distinct elements to be investigated in the aftermath of the Sept. 11th developments. First, there is the military coup-attempt itself, which might be described as the intended "detonator" of the operation as a whole. The worst possible result of this military plot, a potential, runaway thermonuclear-superpower-escalation, was avoided through a timely telephone conversation between U.S. President George W. Bush and Russia's President Vladimir Putin. Second, there is the general political-strategic factor of the "Clash of Civilizations" policy of Zbigniew Brzezinski, Samuel Huntington, et al., of which the attempted military coup was merely a subsumed part. That policy is the principal culprit, and the main body of the operation as a whole. That is the principal subject, and target of this report. This is the factor which continues to be reflected so vividly in the ferocious factional battle within the U.S. government and leading news media, the debate on such subjects as proposing escalation of war against Iraq. Third, there is the implicit suicide-bomber-like role of the current Israeli regime [4000 some Israelis who normally worked in the WTC were not there on Sep 11, so the Israeli connection is very believable], whose adducibly characteristic intention is to set off the wider war, a war which, among other results, would bring about the self-extermination of Israel as a state [not the Israelis’ intent, of course]. That increasingly evident risk of Israel's self-extermination, if it continues its present policies, had been the stated concern motivating Prime Minister Rabin's support for the Oslo Accords. These are the same Oslo Accords whose adoption was the motive for the Israeli coup d'état, by assassination, of Rabin. … It is the second of those three interconnected elements, on which official attention must be pivoted. Nonetheless, if we neglected any one among all three of those facets from the equation of Sept. 11th, no competent assessment of the events of that date were possible.
Here's material on McCain and Lieberman, which shows that The Enterprise Mission was on the wrong track in 2000 to back McCain. Richard Hoagland lives in Arizona, McCain's state, and the nearness must've been too enticing. http://larouchein2004.net/pages/pressreleases/2002/020714mccain.htm -- It is suggested that printouts be made [from the website articles linked to here] and sent or given to people in leading positions in politics, etc. Since the corruption and scheming are part of the coup and Iraqi war efforts, which would put us and the world in serious chaos, we'd best take action. LaRouche has influence and intelligence and is worth heeding and supporting [ larouchein2004.net
] Here are parts of two articles.
. The Real Corruption: -- McCain And Lieberman -- by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. -- July 14, 2002 -- The biggest scandal you have seen so far, is about to explode in the nation's face. It is all about Senator John McCain's financial - and political - connections to both the giant organized-crime apparatus centered in Arizona, and to Senator Joseph Lieberman. -- Don't be fooled again. Today's everyday financial swindles, such as those of Enron, Harken, Halliburton, and both the major accounting firms and most leading economic forecasters, are typical of the same tradition of giant financial scandals which swept President Herbert Hoover out of office back in 1932. The deadly danger is, that the “Bull Moose” [-like] third-party apparatus being organized out of the Washington D.C. Hudson Institute might be able to use the scandals against President Bush to create a kind of Jacobin-Terror [akin to 9-11] control of both the Republican and Democratic party machines, and the U.S. Congress, too. -- Clear your heads. Ever since Paul Volcker and his successor Alan Greenspan ran the United States, top-down, from the office of Chairman of the Federal Reserve, scandals like those involving the Keating Five [involving McCain et al] have become typical of the way both Washington D.C. and corporate America and its banks, mutual funds, and leading accounting firms have been run. The attempt to control the U.S.A., the political parties, and its foreign policy by the organized-crime links to McCain and Lieberman, is something else. -- The crucial facts of the McCain and Lieberman corruption are already established facts, on the record. -- McCain and Lieberman are not only backed by some of the vilest organized-crime networks in America. That pair are the leading proponents of the mass-murderous, Brzezinski-Huntington - "Chessboard"/”Clash of Civilizations” policy, through the McCain front-organization centered in the Washington, D.C. office of the Hudson Institute. Recently, Hudson sponsored a Senate symposium, at which they called for a major destabilization of the Saudi royal family, and a U.S. military occupation of the Saudi oil fields. This same Hudson Washington, D.C. office also houses the whole McCain third party “Bull Moose” operation, through the person of Marshall Wittmann, a former operative of the Temple Mount fanatical "fundy," Rev. "Diamond" Pat Robertson. -- In the Feb. 4, 2002 edition of the New Yorker magazine, the filthy McCain-Lieberman blackmail game against President Bush was spelled out: If Bush fails to back Ariel Sharon, overthrow Saddam Hussein, and take other steps guaranteed to launch a global war, McCain will run as the third-party spoiler candidate, in a replay of the 1912 Teddy Roosevelt, Bull Moose Party-organized defeat of President William Howard Taft, and the installation of a notorious Ku Klux Klan fanatic, Woodrow Wilson, in the White House. The facts behind that New Yorker story check out, and much more besides. -- Even a cursory look at the Arizona apparatus that installed John McCain in the U.S. Congress and Senate, makes it clear that the man sometimes rumored to be deserving of the name “Manchurian Candidate,” may also be kooky, but he is, essentially, just a front for organized crime. McCain married into the Sam Bronfman-created Arizona mob, which has run the state, top-down and bottom-up, since Prohibition. Kemper Marley, the man designated by Sam Bronfman as the whiskey king of the Southwest, put McCain's father-in-law in the beer distribution business, and that business is now the source of McCain's several hundred million dollar fortune--the basis of his entire political career. -- No wonder McCain was one of the “Keating Five,” the members of Congress who were implicated in the Michael Milken late-1980s junk-bond swindles. No wonder McCain is in bed with the Emprise/Sports Services mob first exposed in the book Dope, Inc. -- A pivotal element in the McCain and Lieberman criminal nexus is the Indian gambling casinos that dot the landscape of both Arizona, and particularly of Connecticut. McCain's so-called campaign finance reform bill, which banned “soft money,” allowed one crucial exemption: Indian gaming. Take the wealth of the Indians' real estate, and give those Esaus the pottage of disease-infected blankets and whiskey in return. If they can't find an actual indian, inventing a fake tribe may serve the same purpose. -- That is only the beginning. There is a lot more. -- The bottom line: It is urgent that the Democratic Party emerge, under new leadership, in the continuing tradition of FDR, JFK, and Lyndon LaRouche, as the legitimate focal point of opposition to the foolish wars into which McCain and Lieberman are doing so much to blackmail the Bush Administration into fighting. -- For this to happen, the McCain-Lieberman corrupt blackmail operation must be exposed. I promise you; it will be thoroughly exposed, as we move to take the Democratic Party of Franklin Roosevelt back, for the sake of our republic, its people, and the world. -- I will do my job. If you also do yours, we could save this nation from something awful. -- http://larouchein2004.net/pages/pressreleases/2002/020725electable.htm -- Two general measures must be taken. First, we must shut down the political blackmail currently being exerted on the Presidency by the McCain-Lieberman cabal’s influence on the Senate, the Congress as a whole, and the leadership of the major political parties. Second, we must build the kind of bi-partisan political infrastructure around the Presidency, which gives the Presidency the policy-options needed, both to extricate itself from its own recent follies [Afghanistan], and to develop a new form of collaboration for economic reconstruction with nations growing increasingly restive over the nauseous impact of the influence on current U.S. strategic practice, of desperadoes such as McCain, Lieberman, Wolfowitz [the Afghan war promoter immediately after 9-11], Richard Perle, et al. -- By sinking the future political ambitions of Lieberman and McCain now, we create an otherwise non-existent possibility for a rational form of bi-partisan deliberation on options available to the Presidency. We must make that change now; the U.S. is presently careening toward strategic economic and other global disasters. Change is urgent; the time is now. -- McCain is not the worst. His financial connections, the antics of the Hudson Institute, and his personal instability, are serious problems in themselves. However, the danger from McCain comes chiefly through his ties to the Joe Lieberman whom William F. Buckley, Jr. and the far-right National Review gang brought into the Senate. It is the combination of known and dark connections between Lieberman and McCain, which has enabled the crew around Lieberman to hold U.S. policy-shaping hostage since the time of Senator Jeffords’ retirement from the Republican Party. -- My associates and I are currently working, at my prompting, to expose the ugly public record and other relevant facts about the Lieberman-McCain-Buckley-Steinhardt connection. When the broader public discovers what that record shows, as I know that record now, Joe Lieberman will not be qualified for mayor of East Dogpatch, Connecticut. Open the floodgates for new leadership of the Democratic Party, and we will be situated to reshape a bi-partisan environment around the Presidency. No one can guarantee success; but, since it is the only live option available in the short term, we must take it.
|
| supplements | | | comments on this article on indymedia.org | guido - 02.08.2002 23:16
What's LaRouche's game? (english)
curious 12:09pm Fri Aug 2 '02
comment#195751
I don't know what to make of LaRouche. Anyone have reliable information on what his game is? The following is what I turned up at the pir.org namebase search:
LaRouche started as a sectarian leftist and self-styled intellectual in the late 1960s. By 1973 cadres from his National Caucus of Labor Committees launched "Operation Mop Up" and began beating up rival leftist groups. Within several years the NCLC stepped over that thin line between sectarian leftism and the right wing, and was cooperating with the KKK, Liberty Lobby, and law enforcement officials. In the early Reagan years, LaRouche's anti-Sovietism found expression through his lobbying on behalf of Star Wars and his access to U.S. intelligence and other officials. His publications such as Executive Intelligence Review are taken seriously by journalists and investigators because of their demonstrated access to occasional inside information. At the same time, LaRouche's people are understandably regarded with a certain amount of healthy suspicion.
LaRouchian political theory is a mixture of Kant, anti-Semitism, and paranoic tirades against everything from British empiricism to Oliver North. It is something of a mystery how LaRouche funds his organization, which is also active in Germany. He was convicted in 1988 of conspiracy, mail fraud, and tax evasion.
Extracts from Dennis King's _Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism_ New York: Doubleday, 1989
Mark Evans (english)
Gosh 1:30pm Fri Aug 2 '02
comment#195770
See what Mark Evans has to say about LaRouche:
WHO IS THIS LAROUCHE AND WHAT DOES HE WANT?
http://www.sonic.net/~doretk/ArchiveARCHIVE/MARK%20EVANS/WhoisthisLaRouche.html
THE DIALECTICAL MERRY-G-ROUND
http://www.sonic.net/~doretk/ArchiveARCHIVE/MARK%20EVANS/DialecticalMerry-go.html
My opinion about LaRouche (english)
IMC reader 1:31pm Fri Aug 2 '02
comment#195771
IMO, LaRouche is making a false dichotomy between the interests of the Democratic Party and Bush, and between the Saudis and Israel, and between Israel and the US elite. The evidence has shown all these groups to be cooperating. They all benefit from the terrorist attacks, and all of them are complicit in recent terrorism.
LaRouche is deliberately or unwittingly spreading disinformation to create a sense of drama and political friction where none exists.
It might be true that Lieberman and McCain represent the Israeli mob US faction and that the Bush administration represents the oil and defense industry mob faction but LaRouche hasnâ t demonstrated why these two factions would be at odds. I donâ t believe they are significantly at odds.
Iâ m not even mildly inclined to support LaRoucheâ s 2004 campaign. I donâ t trust the guy, though his economic criticism might have some merit.
 Website: http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=195744&group=webcast
| | LaRouche is an insane megalomaniac | Peter Zegers - 03.08.2002 00:05
Dear Guido,
Here's some information on LaRouche:
Dennis King, "Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism" (Doubleday: New York 1989).
I guess the best monograph on the subject so far.
Helmut Lorscheid & Leo M. Müller, "Deckname Schiller: Die Deutschen Patrioten des Lyndon LaRouche" (Rowohlt: Reinbek bei Hamburg 1986).
LYNDON LAROUCHE: Fascism Wrapped in an American Flag
by Chip Berlet and Joel Bellman
http://www.publiceye.org/larouche/nclcmain.html
http://www.publiceye.org/larouche/nclc2.html
Spend some time reading the excellent material on the Political Research Association's website. For ex.:
http://www.publiceye.org/larouche/LaRouche_Theories.htm
http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v08n3/holodeni.html
Ikzelf schreef iets over LaRouche op: http://www.gebladerte.nl/20064g21.htm
Thierry Maricourt, "Les Nouvelles passarelles de l'êxtreme droite" (Syllepse: Paris 1997).
Annelies Borsboom, "Opening van Zaken":
De inlichtingendienst van het wereldwijde LaRouche-imperium werkte onder andere voor de regeringen van Iran,
Saoedi-Arabië en Irak, voor Japanse multinationals en Franse en Italiaanse inlichtingendiensten. Zuidafrikaanse
oppositiekranten onthulden in 1978 het 'Muldergate'-schandaal, waarbij bleek dat de inlichtingendienst BOSS LaRouche had ingehuurd voor een inlichtingen- en propagandacampagne in de VS en Europa met een budget van 78 miljoen dollar. Het Europe- se centrum van LaRouche's inlichtingenactiviteiten bevindt zich in Wiesbaden. Vanaf 1973 hebben de LaRouchies contacten opgebouwd met hoge Westduitse militaire- en inlichtingenfunc- tionarissen. De leiding van de Duitse tak van de LaRouche-inlichtingendienst is in handen van Anno Hellenbroich, broer van Herbert Hellenbroich die van 1981 tot 1985 het Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz leidde. LaRouche houdt er de meest bizarre complottheorieën op na. Om een voorbeeld te noemen: "De gezagsstructuur van de Zionistische Lobby start bij de Orde van Sint Johannes en de gedegenereerde oligarchieën rond de Britse, Nederlandse en Belgische koningshuizen". Vooral het Verenigd Koninkrijk en joden moeten het ontgelden. Zo is er sprake van "verbindingen tussen de krachten van het kwaad van de Brits/Joods/Maltezer Orde en de oude oligarchische elite, die in het Nieuwe Testament al is geïdentificeerd als de Hoer van Babylon".
Online op: http://www.xs4all.nl/~respub/artikelen/opening10.htm
| |
| supplements | |
