|
|  |
Inval bij karin Spaink
Niek - 13.09.2002 17:27
Politie valt binnen bij publiciste Karin Spaink
"Inval van OM in woning Karin Spaink
Het Openbaar Ministerie heeft donderdag een inval gedaan in de woning van
Karin Spaink in Amsterdam, zo schrijft Het Parool. Spaink is schrijfster en
columniste van de krant.
Het OM zou op zoek zijn geweest naar bewijsmiddelen in de zaak tegen de
Scientology Church. Spaink is een voorvechtster van vrijheid van
meningsuiting op het internet. Zij raakte een aantal jaar geleden in
conflict met de Scientology nadat zij een document van de beweging op haar
website plaatste.
De bewijsmiddelen die het OM zocht, zouden dienen om de beschuldigingen aan
het adres van de schrijfster te staven."
 Website: http://www.xs4all.nl/~nholtz
|
| Lees meer over: vrijheid, repressie & mensenrechten | | aanvullingen | | | www.SPAINK.NET | M02 - 13.09.2002 21:47
Zie nog niet hierover op Karin Spainks website
En kan je in het vervolg je bron ook even linken?
Dank U.
:-)
Website: http://www.xs4all.nl/~kspaink
| | meer info | Hans Bunschoten - 13.09.2002 22:12
Voor meer info zie de nieuwsgroep:
In article in nl.scientology,
Zenon Panoussis
| | Raided again | LinkMichel - 14.09.2002 14:51
Van:Zenon Panoussis
Discussies:alt.religion.scientology, nl.scientology, xs4all.general
Datum:2002-09-12 03:09:10 PST
Half an hour ago a team of copyright infringement
investigators and computer experts, four in total,
left Karin's place after finishing scientology's
latest raid against me and the very first one
against Karin. They had arrived two and a half
hours earlier in the company of two policemen, with
a search warrant signed by the public prosecutor.
The cause: scientology's repeated and persistent
complaints that we are spreading OTs, NOTs and god
knows what nots. The "evidence":
 http://search.freewinds.nl/skriptures.html . Yes,
indeed, a webpage saying "you won't find any OTs
and NOTs here" is clear evidence that the OTs and
NOTs are being spread from that site. If you don't
get the logic, you haven't been a scientologist
long enough and you need to work harder on your
bridge.
Anyway, we had the choice between co-operating and
not co-operating. If we did co-operate, we would
be voluntarily subjecting ourselves to an invasion
of privacy, but get the whole thing done and over
with for both parties. If we did not co-operate,
they would be left empty-handed (encrypted drives,
as one should have expected), but we would be left
equally empty-handed while they took the computers
for a year-long futile investigation. We decided
to co-operate and gave them full access, with the
agreement that they wouldn't nose closely on what
obviously, at their own judgement, was not what they
were looking for.
Fine. They found nothing. There was nothing to find.
Our own private copies of the OTs and NOTs, of course,
but those are part of the evidence in our respective
lawsuits and several courts have already ruled that
even if we may not spread them, we may possess them.
So those copies don't count.
To make the search complete and avoid having to go
through the same procedure once again, I offered
the search team to search on the freewinds webserver
too. They gladly accepted and arrived at the same
results: nothing illegal there. The net result is
that I now have an official statement from the
authorities that there is nothing illegal on the
server, which I can use when the CoS complains to
domain registries and search engines and upstream
providers about that same server.
As for the intimidation and harassment value of the
search, we are thinking about a suitable revenge.
A few pickets, better organised and more spectacular
than what we have done so far, seems appropriate.
Better ideas are welcome by e-mail.
Z
Website: http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=nl&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=oh01ouk01sdtiqhcclk35k2gs276spnlin%404ax.com&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Dnl%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26group%
| | advokatentuig | sjonnie - 19.09.2002 13:02
Het advokatenkantoor Nauta Dutilh heeft hiervoor aan scientology hand- en spandiensten geleverd.
Ik dacht dat gerenommeerde, hoog aangeslagen advokatenkantoren zich hiervoor niet zouden lenen.
Nauta Dutilh hoort daar klaarblijkelijk niet bij, en accepteert vrolijk de intimidatie-opdrachten van de nepkerk.
De volgende keer dat een officier van justitie iets van Nauta Dutilh ontvangt, zou die het toch iets beter moeten lezen, laten nakijken en vooral laten verifiëren...
| |
| aanvullingen | |
